Hiding in the Backwaters Just one more blog on the net.

22May/030

“Don’t look at me. I never said that.”

Everyone's favorite Baptist minister, Fred Phelps, is at it again. Julius Carter, A Des Moines, Iowa high school student, has been awarded a scholarship created in honor of Matthew Sheppard, a young man who was tortured and killed in 1998 for being gay. Apparently Fred thinks this is an event worthy of his attention. "The plan is to stand peacefully on the sidewalk...and remind these people that there is a God, that there is a day of judgement and that it's not OK to be gay," said Phelp's daughter and congregational spokesperson. Asked about detracting from the graduation cerimonies, Phelp's daughter said, "Everyone is involved right up to their eyeballs. If they're not standing up and saying, 'no no no,' then they're not doing their duty to their Lord God."

It never ceases to amaze me how people can claim to be Christian but completely ingore the life of Christ. Phelps seems to be possessed of what I would call and Old Testament mentality. (Never mind the rightness or wrongness of his views.) Moses came down from Mount Sinai with what is often called the Mosaic law: eye for an eye, judgement and retribution, step out of line and I'll bust your chops, that sort of thing. Interesting isn't it that is has always been called the Mosaic law? The tablets were written on by the finger of God. Why isn't it referred to as God's Law? Maybe because it isn't God's law?

Early in Christ's ministry he gave a small sermon. Most people refer to it as "The Sermon on the Mount." It was just a small thing, I can understand how some people might have over looked it.

Ye have heard that it hath been said, Thou shalt love thy neighbour, and hate thine enemy. But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you; That ye may be the children of your Father which is in heaven: for he maketh his sun to rise on the evil and on the good, and sendeth rain on the just and on the unjust.

Matthew 5:43-45

Christ taught that he had come to fulfill "the law [of Moses]" (Matthew 5: 17), and endeavored to teach a law based on mercy and understanding, on personal responsibility and not blind justice founded on a laundry list of do's and don'ts. He also taught even the laundry list had become corrupt over the years. (Matthew 15:1-11) Paul later taught "For all the law is fulfilled in one word, even in this; Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself." (Galatians 5: 14) Doesn't it seem odd for a God who preached love, compassion and mercy to condone the "God hates fags" message of Mr. Phelps? On the other hand, if Fred is being truly literal in keeping the commandments, that would imply he doesn't think very much of himself and is a very unhappy man.

Filed under: Religion, Wingnuts No Comments
10May/030

Will the real pro-gay party please stand up?

Much ballyhoo is made over which political party a gay person should choose. In fact, in many circles if you are not a Democrat you are not a true homosexual, much in the same way that if you are not a Republican you are not a true Mormon. (I grew up in the Mormon church and still live in Utah. Trust me. I know whereof I speak.) The Democrats are certainly much more willing to openly court the gay vote. They are vocal about their support for gay rights, and critical of the Republicans' socially conservative ideologies which continue to exclude gay and lesbian Americans. Indeed it seems the Republican party would like to take us back to the days of the Puritan pilgrims when America was more of a theocracy than a democratic republic. On the surface it seems almost self evident that a gay or lesbian American should adhere to the Democratic party. But is it really that cut and dried?

Democrats have generally been those who have sponsored and supported pro-gay legislation. Howard Dean signed civil unions into law in Vermont. Gray Davis signed a similar law in California. Bill Clinton appointed some 150 openly gay and lesbian people to government posts while in office. He also created a federal anitdiscrimination policy which included sexual orientation.

Believe it or not, Republicans, including the much maligned Dubbya, have a track record as well. Oddly enough it would appear that the Republicans' bark is worse than their bite. It was Republicans Gov. Pataki and Mayor Guliani of New York who signed an executive order ensuring survivor benefits for partners of gays and lesbians lost in the attacks of September 11. President Bush has lauched a major global AIDS program, signed a bill ending a nine year ban on domestic partnership registration in Washington D.C., and has left Clinton's anitdiscrimination policy intact.

Bush has also appointed Scott Evertz, an openly gay man, to the post of AIDS Policy Director making him the first Republican president to name a gay American to an office within the Executive Branch. He also named another openly gay man, Michael Guest, as ambassdor to Romania. During the swearing in ceremony Guest's partner, who will accompany him to Romania, was openly acknowledged as such by Secretary of State Colin Powell. It is also worth noting that the first public condemnation of the insane and vicious remarks by Fallwell and Robertson after the attacks on September 11 came from the Bush White House. For all of these things he has received sharp criticism from the conservative right, those to whom he's often accused of pandering.

Yes, Bush has also done some things that seem to counter any postive acts he might have made for gay and lesbian Americans. His faith based initiatives are dangerously close to state sanctioned discrimination. His show of support for the extremely conservative remarks of Santorum is also upsetting. But in all fairness, the Democrats aren't perfect either.

In the current Democratic race for the presidential nomination, Howard Dean is making much ado about the civil unions he created in Vermont. It is a step in the right direction to be sure. I do appricate the political risk he took in championing that cause. However, I have a problem with someone whose foundation for gay civil rights is "separate but equal." Black Americans didn't stand for that. I have yet to find someone who can convince me that gay Americans should.

Dick Gephardt has joined the fray with his lesbian daughter campaigning for him. That's touching and sweet, but a big political ho-hum. Dick Cheney's lesbian daughter is also politically active and visible in Republican circles.

Bill Clinton left us with the disastrous Don't-Ask-Don't-Tell-yatta-yatta policy which essentially gave the military legal grounds for dismissing gay and lesbian servicemen. And let's not forget DOMA (the Defense of Marriage Act). What a cop out. He should have at least vetoed the thing and made congress ratify it on their own. Yes, it would still have become law, but at least his name wouldn't be on it. For someone who is supposedly a great friend of gays and lesbians it was a real slap in the face.

In short, instead of picking your polictical affliations based on gay and lesbian issues, maybe you should think about picking your policital affiliations based on things like, style of government, taxation, and foreign and economic policies.