Are we voting for President or the Pope?
Thankfully I am not the only one who has had it with the religious tenor of this presidential election. Even the Democrat's are busy trying to prove each is more religious than the other. It's not only infantile and annoying, it's irrelevant. So you can begin to understand why I find this tid bit by Melissa McEwan over at AlterNet.org priceless:
Saying "I'm a Christian" or "I'm agnostic" or "I'm a Sikh" says nothing about a person's intrinsic character, despite what plenty of people who wear each of those labels (and others) would have us believe.
Can you say Priestly Pedophile, Jimmy Swaggart, Jim Bakker, or Ted Haggard?
So it doesn't really matter a fig to me whether Romney believes Jesus and Satan are brothers; I still know he's a disingenuous, opportunistic, integrity-challenged dodo. That Huckabee is trying to make it an issue only confirms that he is a brainless, ethically-impaired gobshite, hiding behind his religion because he's got nothing else to offer.
Their respective religious beliefs didn't figure at all in those calculations.
Hallelujah, sister!